How false claims about 5G health risks spread into the mainstream This article is more than 3 months old. Video disabled here. But most experts say more quality research is needed. Spirulina, Wheat Grass, Vitamin C, and similar supplements are consumable forms of sunlight, which will always improve our health and raise our vibrations. But asserting that the higher frequency is more dangerous is just that—an assertion, and there’s little real science to stand behind it. He has lived at ashrams with enlightened masters, including Amma, the Hugging Saint, for whom he’s delivered keynotes at Her worldwide events. *Correction 6/24/19: A previous version of this article made it sound as though “Resolution 1815 of the Council of Europe” recommended the moratorium on 5G when it was the consortium of 180 scientists and doctors mentioned in the opening paragraph.Paul Wagner is an Intuitive-Empath, clairvoyant reader, and a 5-time EMMY Award winning writer. We’ve seen controversies about everything from the Electromagnetic hypersensitivity, for example, is a hypothetical disease in which certain people experience debilitating symptoms in the presence of radiation like cell phones and Wi-Fi—so yes, Michael McKean’s bizarre behavior on “Better Call Saul” is a real thing. Carpenter stirred global controversy in the 1980s by asserting that high-voltage power lines could cause leukemia in nearby children. Indeed, researchers continue to conduct studies. The above article may contain affiliate links, which help support How-To Geek.How-To Geek is where you turn when you want experts to explain technology. “That’s why they put the towers so close together,” he said. 5G will substantially increase exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF)… and has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.”With download speeds up to 20 to 30X faster than 4G, 5G promises a new world, including becoming the foundation for self-driving cars while also causing a long list of potential health risks. After all, there are many technologies we use every day with a substantially higher measurable risk. These are external links and will open in a new windowThe 5G mobile network has been switched on in some UK cities and has led to questions about whether the new technology poses health risks.So what are the concerns, and is there any evidence to back them up?As with previous cellular technologies, 5G networks rely on signals carried by radio waves - part of the electromagnetic spectrum - transmitted between an antenna or mast and your phone.We're surrounded by electromagnetic radiation all the time - from television and radio signals, as well as from a whole range of technologies, including mobile phones, and from natural sources such as sunlight.5G uses higher frequency waves than earlier mobile networks, allowing more devices to have access to the internet at the same time and at faster speeds.These waves travel shorter distances through urban spaces, so 5G networks require more transmitter masts than previous technologies, positioned closer to ground level. There are several studies that show EMFs (electromagnetic fields) may increase cancer risks in both animals and humans. We always have control of our future, even if the general public is headed in another direction. As Ongoing studies aside, 5G is coming, and as mentioned, there are concerns about this new technology.A common complaint about 5G is that, due to the lower power of 5G transmitters, there will be more of them. He warned that children were especially vulnerable to the cancer risk of wireless technology. How worried should you be about the coming 5G healthpocalypse?By now, you may have seen articles on Facebook or alternative health websites. Human health concerns will be amplified by the 5G cellular towers. Studies that demonstrate that 5G is a health risk. Says Neil Derek Grace, a communications officer at the FCC, “For 5G equipment, the signals from commercial wireless transmitters are typically far below the RF exposure limits at any location that is accessible to the public.” The FCC defers to the FDA for actual health risk assessments, which takes a direct, but low-key approach to addressing the risks: “The weight of scientific evidence has not linked cell phones with any health problems.”In 2011, the World Health Organization weighed in, classifying RF Radiation as a Group 2B agent, which is defined as “Possibly carcinogenic to humans.” This, too, is nuanced.